Introduction
Water is a vital and increasingly scarce resource, especially in South Asia, where over a billion people depend on rivers flowing from the Himalayas. The Indus Waters Treaty (IWT), signed in 1960 between Pakistan and India, is one of the most enduring and successful water-sharing agreements in the world. Brokered by the World Bank, it has survived wars, political hostility, and regional tensions, serving as a testament to the potential of diplomacy and cooperation.
This essay discusses the historical context, key provisions, significance, challenges, and future prospects of the Indus Waters Treaty between Pakistan and India.
Historical Context
After the partition of British India in 1947, the Indus River system, consisting of six major rivers (Indus, Jhelum, Chenab, Ravi, Beas, and Sutlej), was divided between the two new nations: Pakistan and India. The partition disrupted the management of the river system, especially because the headworks of some rivers were located in India while the irrigation systems primarily lay in Pakistan.
In April 1948, India temporarily suspended water supply from the Upper Bari Doab Canal to Pakistan, escalating tensions. Although an interim agreement was reached, it became clear that a long-term, legally binding solution was needed. After years of negotiations facilitated by the World Bank, the Indus Waters Treaty was signed on September 19, 1960, by Indian Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru, Pakistani President Ayub Khan, and W.A.B. Iliff of the World Bank.
Key Provisions of the Treaty
The IWT allocates the waters of the Indus River system between Pakistan and India as follows:
1. River Allocation
- Pakistan was given exclusive rights over the Western Rivers: Indus, Jhelum, and Chenab.
- India was given exclusive rights over the Eastern Rivers: Ravi, Beas, and Sutlej.
2. Transitional Period
India was allowed to use the water of the Eastern rivers for some time, while Pakistan constructed replacement infrastructure such as link canals, dams, and barrages (e.g., Mangla and Tarbela Dams).
3. Use of Western Rivers by India
India is allowed non-consumptive use (e.g., for hydropower, navigation, and fishing) of the Western Rivers, but it cannot store or divert their waters in a way that affects Pakistan’s share.
4. Permanent Indus Commission (PIC)
The treaty established a Permanent Indus Commission, comprising one commissioner from each country. They are tasked with:
- Monitoring treaty implementation
- Sharing data
- Resolving disputes at the technical level
5. Dispute Resolution Mechanism
The treaty provides a three-tiered mechanism:
- Bilateral discussions via the PIC
- Neutral Expert appointment for technical issues
- International Court of Arbitration for legal disputes (under the aegis of the World Bank)
Significance of the Treaty
1. A Model of Water Cooperation
Despite the hostile political relationship and three wars between the two countries, the IWT has largely held firm, making it a rare example of cooperation between adversaries.
2. Lifeline for Pakistan
Over 80% of Pakistan’s agriculture and population depend on the Indus River system. The treaty provides Pakistan legal ownership over the critical Western rivers, which form the backbone of its agrarian economy.
3. Avoidance of Water Wars
The treaty has prevented the weaponization of water and served as a deterrent against aggressive moves such as damming or diverting water unilaterally.
4. Institutionalized Dialogue
The PIC provides an ongoing, apolitical platform for both countries to resolve disputes and share hydrological data.
Challenges and Disputes
Despite its success, the Indus Waters Treaty faces several challenges:
1. Indian Hydroelectric Projects
Pakistan has raised objections over several Indian hydroelectric projects on the Western rivers, including:
- Baglihar Dam (Chenab) – resolved by a neutral expert
- Kishanganga Project (Jhelum) – taken to the Court of Arbitration
- Ratle Project – also disputed due to its design features
Pakistan argues that these projects could allow India to control water flow and impact agriculture, while India maintains that they comply with treaty provisions for run-of-the-river projects.
2. Climate Change
Glacial melting, irregular monsoons, and reduced river flow due to climate change pose a long-term threat to water availability. The treaty does not adequately address climate-induced changes.
3. Political Tensions
Whenever political tensions escalate, especially after incidents like the Uri attack (2016) or the Pulwama attack (2019), voices in India have occasionally called for scrapping or modifying the treaty. Pakistan views such threats as a breach of international law.
4. Outdated Framework
Critics argue that the treaty, signed over 60 years ago, does not account for modern water management practices, groundwater use, or ecological concerns.
Recent Developments
In recent years:
- In 2023, Pakistan objected to the construction of new Indian dams and formally requested modifications to the treaty’s dispute resolution mechanisms.
- The World Bank reactivated arbitration proceedings in response to Pakistan’s concerns, although India objected to this move, preferring a neutral expert.
- Climate and geopolitical dynamics have increased the urgency to update or at least re-evaluate the treaty.
Pakistan’s Perspective
For Pakistan, the Indus Waters Treaty is:
- A cornerstone of water security
- A legally binding safeguard against Indian water aggression
- A critical issue of survival for its agriculture and food security
Pakistan continues to rely on the treaty as a tool of international law and diplomacy, pressing for strict compliance and resolution of disputes through legal forums.
India’s Perspective
India views the treaty as:
- Generous, as it allocated 80% of the total water flow to Pakistan
- Restrictive, especially in utilizing its own share of Western rivers for development
- A technical agreement rather than a political one
Some voices in India argue for revising or withdrawing from the treaty, especially when bilateral relations deteriorate, though such actions could attract international criticism and legal consequences.
Way Forward
For the Indus Waters Treaty to remain effective, the following steps are necessary:
1. Strengthen Institutional Mechanisms
Enhance the capacity of the PIC to deal with emerging challenges like climate change and ecological degradation.
2. Transparency and Data Sharing
Both countries should share real-time data on river flows and dam operations to reduce mistrust.
3. Climate Adaptation Strategies
Incorporate climate resilience measures and update treaty provisions to address modern environmental realities.
4. Promote Joint Projects
Rather than building rival dams, Pakistan and India can explore joint hydro projects or flood control initiatives for mutual benefit.
5. Keep Politics Out of Water
Water is a humanitarian and developmental issue. It must be de-politicized and kept separate from military or ideological disputes.
Conclusion
The Indus Waters Treaty is a remarkable achievement in the realm of international water diplomacy. Despite persistent hostility, the agreement has served as a vital legal and institutional safeguard, particularly for Pakistan’s water security. However, new challenges like climate change, population pressure, and rising regional instability necessitate an evolution of the treaty’s framework.
For Pakistan and India, sustaining and strengthening this treaty is not just a matter of legal obligation, but also a step toward ensuring regional peace, environmental sustainability, and shared prosperity.
Discover more from
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.